It is a fundamental truth that you can identify an organization’s priorities by looking at its budget. When an organization pays its employees less than what they could earn elsewhere, but still plows resources that could go to compensation into other projects, like a new building or executive perks, it’s not hard to tell where the prosperity and welfare of its workforce falls on that organization’s priority list. Where the faculty rank in NSHE’s priorities will be coming into sharper focus as the Board of Regents awaits a recommendation from its newly formed Committee to Recommend Board Action on FY 2025 Salary Increases. An update from the committee is expected at the October 20 special meeting of the Board.
Already there is a divide. We applaud the campus presidents who have recently declared their support publicly for the full 11% COLA, matching our Classified coworkers and all other state employees. We encourage the other presidents to follow their lead, but there appears to be more organized resistance now than there was in June 2023 when hundreds of academic and administrative faculty made their voices heard, convincing the Board of Regents to approve the full 12% COLA for FY 2024.
Ironically, the greatest resistance is coming from the institutions that saw the greatest growth in their state-allocated funding from the 2023 Nevada Legislature.
State appropriated funds for NSHE formula-funded instructional budgets |
Institution |
*FY2022 |
*FY2023 |
**FY2024 |
**FY2025 |
Change for biennium |
UNLV |
$180,367,661 |
$188,138,610 |
$209,161,530 |
$212,055,165 |
$52,710,424 |
14.30% |
UNR |
$128,307,698 |
$129,888,921 |
$141,600,407 |
$143,604,596 |
$27,008,384 |
10.50% |
NSC |
$25,581,096 |
$25,815,872 |
$31,014,568 |
$31,103,180 |
$10,720,780 |
20.90% |
CSN |
$100,013,941 |
$103,622,123 |
$103,093,245 |
$103,540,400 |
$2,986,581 |
1.50% |
GBC |
$14,130,910 |
$14,872,388 |
$14,649,803 |
$14,718,803 |
$365,308 |
1.30% |
TMCC |
34,327,835 |
$35,579,629 |
$35,544,817 |
$35,698,145 |
$1,335,498 |
1.90% |
WNC |
$14,332,707 |
$14,483,533 |
$15,766,811 |
$15,822,790 |
$2,773,331 |
9.60% |
TOTAL |
$490,061,848 |
$512,412,076 |
$550,831,181 |
$556,543,047 |
$97,900,304 |
9.70% |
It makes one wonder why institutions that saw double-digit growth in their state-allocated funding would be so resistant to applying some of that money to COLA and ensuring that their compensation doesn’t fall further behind the national average for salaries in the market where they compete for talent.
Their arguments against the full 11% adjustments for next year would be easier to swallow if there hadn’t been a growing disparity between salaries at the top versus the rank and file. In The Compensation Gap pt. 1, we described the widening gap between salary schedules for administrators and executives when compared to the schedules for faculty. As we acknowledged there, changes to the salary schedules don’t affect the vast majority of incumbent employees, only those whose salaries fall below the adjusted minimum in the schedule. Otherwise, the beneficiaries are newly hired employees. But as time moves on and natural turnover occurs, the gaps between salary schedules that were widened in 2023 will result in significant disparities by 2028 and beyond.
Recent history, however, shows that compensation growth for incumbent rank and file academic faculty has lagged all other employee classifications, and in the case of executives and senior administrators, it has lagged significantly.
NSHE Employee Class |
Average Salary
Increase, 11/2021
to 11/2022 |
Academic |
3.9% |
Classified |
6.3% |
Administrative A-D |
7.9% |
Administrative E |
8.7% |
Executives |
14.8% |
OVERALL |
6.0% |
Some growth across all classes during the period reflected in the table above can be attributed to a 1% COLA adjustment. Classified staff received annual steps for the first ten years in their grade; for faculty, there was a 1% merit pool distribution. All other growth occurred where incumbent employees were either promoted, or remained in their positions but received an ad hoc raise. An ad hoc raise can occur for one of several reasons. For example, an individual may absorb additional responsibilities due to campus vacancies, another may be equity adjustments. Some may be for individuals who simply found favor from their supervisors. Nonetheless, in the depths of the pandemic-fueled budget crisis, institutions still found adequate funding to provide substantial ad hoc raises.
NSHE Ad Hoc Salary Adjustments* |
Institution |
FY2022 |
FY2023 |
CSN |
$593,784 |
$282,769 |
DRI |
$125,812 |
$331,999 |
GBC |
|
$68,259 |
NSU |
$215,464 |
$381,417 |
NSHE Admin |
$67,036 |
$150,105 |
TMCC |
$92,364 |
$153,478 |
UNLV |
$1,136,924 |
$1,918,347 |
UNR |
$1,939,987 |
$2,056,406 |
WNC |
$102,394 |
$10,613 |
TOTAL |
$4,273,765 |
$5,353,393 |
While some faculty were the beneficiaries of these ad hoc salary adjustments, the vast majority of recipients were senior administrators and executives. Some ad hoc raises were modest. Some were eye-popping. The table below lists the ten largest individual ad hoc raises at NSHE institutions during each of the 2022 and 2023 fiscal years. One executive's raise at a university is larger than the total of the three largest raises given to faculty in the same year.
Highest NSHE Discretionary Raises (FY2022 and FY2023) |
FY2023 |
Institution Type |
Position |
Employee Class |
Old Salary |
New Salary |
Raise |
Percent Raise |
Universities |
Interim Vice Dean/Chair |
Sr. Admin |
$248,980 |
$400.000 |
$151,020 |
60.7% |
NSHE Admin. |
Associate Vice Chancellor |
Executive |
$136,514 |
$208,942 |
$72,428 |
53.1% |
Universities |
Vice President |
Executive |
$198,175 |
$260,000 |
$61,825 |
31.2% |
NSHE Admin. |
Chief General Counsel |
Executive |
$189,000 |
$242,938 |
$53,938 |
28.5% |
Universities |
Senior Vice President |
Executive |
$310,738 |
$355,000 |
$44,262 |
14.2% |
Universities |
Associate Dean |
Sr. Admin |
$200,000 |
$240,000 |
$40,000 |
20.0% |
Universities |
Lecturer |
Faculty |
$73,772 |
$113,476 |
$39,704 |
53.8% |
Universities |
Professor |
Faculty |
$194,185 |
$233,982 |
$39,797 |
20.5% |
Universities |
Professor |
Faculty |
$131,404 |
$170,000 |
$38,596 |
29.4% |
Universities |
Vice President |
Executive |
$193,659 |
$229,500 |
$35,841 |
18.5% |
FY2022 |
Universities |
Executive Vice President/Provost |
Executive |
$276,000 |
$378,750 |
$102,750 |
37.2% |
Universities |
Assistant Professor |
Faculty |
$324,800 |
$382,012 |
$57,212 |
17.6% |
Universities |
Vice President |
Executive |
$244,007 |
$299,500 |
$55,493 |
22.7% |
Universities |
Dean |
Sr. Admin |
$220,000 |
$270,000 |
$50,000 |
22.7% |
NSHE Admin. |
Chief General Counsel |
Executive |
$216,300 |
$255,234 |
$38,934 |
18.0% |
Community Colleges |
Controller |
Sr. Admin |
$98,492 |
$130,808 |
$32,316 |
32.8% |
Universities |
Vice Provost |
Sr. Admin |
$164,650 |
$195,000 |
$30,350 |
18.4% |
Universities |
Vice President |
Executive |
$226,600 |
$250,000 |
$23,400 |
10.3% |
Community Colleges |
Interim Executive Director |
Sr. Admin |
$104,178 |
$126,511 |
$22,333 |
21.4% |
Universities |
Deputy Controller |
Sr. Admin |
$137,917 |
$160,000 |
$22,083 |
16.0% |
A quick scan of this table reveals that Nevada's universities in FY2022 and FY2023 gave out more of the top ad hoc raises to incumbent employees than the other institutions and those raises went primarily to executives and senior administrators.
It should surprise no one that faculty feel misused when they hear renewed austerity may prevent them from sharing in the largess. We understand that institutions face significant challenges finding the funding in their budgets to pay the full COLA, but we don't believe they are insurmountable.
In a letter to the Committee to Recommend Board Action on FY 2025 Salary Increases, NFA offers our rationale in support of the full 11% COLA. We also offer several recommendations to help ease the budget impact, such as limiting COLA for the highest paid executives and senior administrators, utilizing reserve accounts until registration fee increases catch up, and mandating that at least 80% of student fee revenue be allocated to the state operating budget in support of employee compensation, just to name a few.
Despite our best efforts, though, we know the most effective tools we have at our disposal are faculty voices. Last June, hundreds of faculty members, despite the summer break, responded to our call to speak out for the FY 2024 COLA. It is difficult for Regents to ignore when over 60 rank and file faculty members show up at one meeting to make their case in the public comment period. If we fail to turn out similar or better numbers when the FY 2025 COLA is on the Board's agenda, they will likely assume that we are satisfied with our prior pay bump and will be happy with whatever they approve. We must keep the passion on display.
Between now and that meeting, we encourage all faculty to call, email, or visit the Regent representing your district. Encourage them to approve the full 11% and to consider policy changes that prioritize employee compensation over spending for special projects and unproven initiatives. Most importantly, watch for the COLA proposal on the agenda for an upcoming Board meeting and plan to attend to make a public comment in support of the full amount. Besides the meeting on October 20, a special meeting is scheduled on November 1, and the quarterly meeting will be held November 30/December 1 in Las Vegas. We believe the decision will be made at the quarterly meeting, but we will keep the members notified if anything changes.
The COLA passed by the 2023 Nevada Legislature, and signed by Governor Lombardo, are legitimately historic. There will not be another opportunity for many years, if not decades, for our salaries to recover from the extended period of stagnation. We cannot afford to let this pass us by. At least, not without a fight.